Friday, March 27, 2020

Acting essays

Acting essays Perhaps one of the most thought of questions that goes through ones head in a lifetime may be what drives a person to become an actor. Well, it could be imagination, a love, or just desire to stand out. When one desires to stand out they usually want to be in the light, and the stage is a great place to start. Being on stage for the first time is scary and yet exciting. Once a person has experienced this they most often want more. Usually a person of this stature was always entertaining or performing for friends and family member, thy have humor and it is most likely well developed and focused. Through their childhood they force themselves to be noticed. They love to be in the light. Love, just love for the art can make a person act. The people who love the art are usually the ones who care and understand it the most. Perhaps they can be considered the scarifiers, the one who will do anything to make the audience laugh, cry, and giggle, feel solemn, angry, and happiness. Their love for acting make them who they are and they dont even have to try. The ones who love acting become their character in a performance. Becoming a character is tough, except for those with excellent imaginations. Usually become actors because it comes easy to them, of course, their feet must get wet into acting for them to even begin to see their hidden talent. Once in a theatre, imaginers, if you will, are character in actors shoes, instead of actors in characters shoes. They have high concentration that is not easy to break. In fact, most usually become their character a week or so before a play. As one can see, these tree examples are just a few reasons why people become actors or actresses. Im sure one could easily choose which example they fall into. ...

Friday, March 6, 2020

Analysing The Culture Of Ancient Rome Religion Essays

Analysing The Culture Of Ancient Rome Religion Essays Analysing The Culture Of Ancient Rome Religion Essay Analysing The Culture Of Ancient Rome Religion Essay In ancient Rome, non unlike today, a kid s first lessons came from the parents ( largely mother because the male parent was busy most of the clip ) . This is much like any kid in the U.S. today. After a male reached about six old ages of age he began larning the Torahs, history and physical preparation from his male parent, and in some instances, with the aid of male slaves. I would compare this in my ain life as my pa learning me right from incorrect, reading me books about the more recent wars, learning me to catch a baseball and subscribing me up for small conference when I was immature. The females were allowed to larn their female parent s responsibilities, as to fix to be a good married woman. The best that a male could make was to larn to be a great, influential talker so that he could do his manner onto the political phase. This holds true today ; if you have the personal appeal and fluid speech production ability ( being born into the right household besides helps a batch ) you can seek your fortune in the political circle. Notice I did non advert anything about cognition or ethical motives. The Roman society was a patriarchal 1. This is apparent in the male parent holding entire control of his belongings and everyone within it. It was besides apparent in the fact that girls were taught by their female parents from birth and neer allowed to derive the proper cognition to travel up in society the manner a boy was. This ensured the prominence of work forces in their society. Today, I believe things are a batch different but that we are still a patriarchal society. Although there are state of affairss that differ from the norm, such as single-mother households and sapphic households, the bulk of all households still look to the male parent to do the determinations and to take the incrimination if the determinations fail. Most female parents do the shopping and cookery, unless it s grilling. The female parents do most of the care-taking of the kids still unless the household can afford a nursemaid ( servant ) . One case in Petronius The Satyricon that truly brings that out is when Trimalchio has his retainers blare for Fortunata several times for her to come into the room to see with their friends. My married woman would non stand for that. If I called for her once or came to acquire her she would kindly admit me but if I had everyone in the house shouting her name she would be embarrassed and infuriated. It would non be a good eventide for me subsequently. Patrick Kelley pg. 2 There was a lecherousness for power and wealth merely as there is today. I believe that the Romans grew to understand that with a life in political relations came great wealth and power. Just as today, that encouraged people to make to achieve those places for the incorrect grounds and at all costs. That was portion of the ground for the prostration of Rome as it is portion of our economic and leading convulsion today. Cipher can truly anticipate to transport the wealth and power they accumulate to the hereafter but for some ground we see people even today rushing to achieve as much wealth as possible merely to decease seizing it. Why? ? Merely for the acknowledgment? Just for the bang? Nobody truly knows. But we all know that it does non go through on with us. In the instance of Trimalchio, he came from bondage and had a great amount of money bestowed onto him through an heritage from his maestro. One would believe that he would amp ; acirc ; ˆ?break the concatenation A ; acir c ; ˆA? of actions that he had been cursed to defy all his life but he continued them with a retribution, it seems. You still see people like this today. In North Korea, Kim Jong-Il seems to be such a character. Never a slave as Trimalchio was but he has alienated his state from the universe in an effort to look like a God to his people. He hoards all the state s resources and merely tells them what he wants them to hear, whether it be right or incorrect. He has an extended group of followings that move on his every bid to construct shrines and statues of him. I am certain before he dies he will committee a big cosmetic grave built for his entombment. The Roman civilization revolved around A ; acirc ; ˆ?doers A ; acirc ; ˆA? but they were more like multi-taskers if you ask me. They were a well-versed civilisation that could still take over another instead expeditiously. They were non interested in larning the humanistic disciplines or the finer things but more of the cognition that could let them to last and turn their imperium. They did necessitate to understand the linguistic communication, Torahs and authorities but that was about all of the book knowledge most of them cared to pass their clip on. In some ways we have establishments like this today. We have military academies that train soldiers. Although they offer really intense and honoring instructions they besides train plebes for a military life that will heighten the state s hereafter every bit good as their ain. We do hold many more careers and calling waies to partake in than the Romans did so our schools and colleges now teach a much broader base course of s tudy which allows us to analyze the finer things so that we may broaden our skylines or even go on to learn, ourselves. Merely as today, the Romans besides had those who trained intensely in rhetoric and persuasion. Two such illustrations of this would be Encolpius and Ascyltus from The Satyricon. They were both students of Agamemnon, who had to larn his instructions from another, besides. Merely as the Romans, I fear that we are heading down the route to the extinction of the Great American Empire. It seems as though we, as civilisations, do hold a life-cycle and that rhythm merely holds up every bit long as we feel we have something to be afraid of. We have been known as a universe world power for a twosome hundred old ages. We are afraid of things in this state but they are the incorrect things ; such as slaying, deficiency of wealth, beauty and power, and Armageddon. All of these existed in Rome before the autumn of the imperium. Murder will ever be a job but when it occurs like a pox inside your ain metropolis walls you are doomed to fall. When the wealthy are able to exponentially turn their wealth so the in-between category disappears. The money had to come from someplace and the hapless had none to lose. Patrick Kelley pg. 3 This happened in Rome and is get downing to truly pick up velocity here. I have noticed it ; hold you? When there is no in-between category all you have are a few truly rich people and a batch of truly hapless people. Who supports the economic system if everyone with money is stashing it? A batch of people are disquieted about Armageddon. The paranoia created by these feelings is what causes people to move and respond in ways that will convey an imperium or the full universe down. This besides happened during the terminal of the Roman imperium. If the natural terminal of civilisation comes there will be nil that can be done, although we will seek. Although our vision of beauty is different from the Roman vision of beauty we still gravitate to it like it was our God. Merely as we do today, the Romans gave their wealths off to beauty. This was seen in The Satyricon when Trimalchio received such a big heritage from his maestro. He did non maintain Trimalchio around all that clip merely because he watched over the place. He was infatuated with Trimalchio and kept him around for the sexual partnership. Trimalchio said he besides satisfied his maestro s married woman and I believe him because he said he was nt one to tout. Hopefully America does non go on down the same well-lit and easy accessible way as Trimalchio and Rome. It is ever that way that is easy to take and Trimalchio lit the torches. Hopefully America does non blow her horn so aloud that the fire brigade comes and when she turns back around all her dinner invitees are gone. THE End